Truthstream Media

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

X

Y

Z

This Is What Happens When You Don't Stay in the Prescribed Swim Lane

Melissa Dykes Sep 14, 2019

View on Youtube | View on Truthstream Media

We live in a world where there can apparently be only one official story, and that story is increasingly guarded by digital gatekeepers.

This story reminds me of something our good friend Hesher…of Hesher and Spore who run the show Boiler Room on Alternate Current Radio…is always talking about: prescribed ‟swim lanes” within society. For certain topics or trains of thought or information, there's a prescribed swim lane. It's okay to deviate from the norm a little bit on either side, so long as no one goes outside the prescribed swim lane. Taking the analogy further, many people inherently know deep down that there's a whole ocean outside of this swim lane, but in the name of safety or convenience, of not ‟making waves”, most people stay inside the swim lane anyway. While it may be more comfortable, this lane provides a very narrow slice of a worldview that requires a great deal of faith in people and systems which have not earned it. Such limited sight and the ignorance it produces makes control a lot easier.

Our friend Hesher is always talking about proscribed swimlanes within society and this idea of how with certain topics or trains of thoughts or information there's a proscribed swimlane and it's okay if you deviate from the norm a little here or there so long as you don't get outside of the swimlane.

What I figured out over the last decade is that there's actually a whole ocean outside of the swim lane and without all this other information you really don't know anything. In fact, once you get out into the whole ocean you realize you don't know anything. There's a large portion of society that is stifling in that swim lane and they're desperate for more information because they know that what they're being fed is this one contrived worldview but there's also a lot of people who just stay in that swim lane and it's worse now that we're all being fed information based on feedback loops they've got everyone put into based on collecting your data and using algorithms to feed you information through social media networks and things like that it's tailored on the data that they've collected from you.

I think that is why we're getting to a point in society where more and more people are starting to feel just how synthetic the matrix aspect of everything is and it also doesn't help that we're in a situation where the media is so utterly controlled…and by media I mean all media…I'm not just talking about the news on TV. I'm talking about who owns the major networks…Hollywood and music and books…all of the media that people get so so controlled at the top that society at this point we just keep getting the same recycled storylines and tropes presented to us on a loop. Generationally I mean, it's to the point where over at Snopes they even had to quote-unquote debunk that Walt Disney's will doesn't require Disney movies to be remade every 10 years because they're like, ‟didn't anyone at Disney ever come up with a new idea,” Why they just keep making the same movies over and over and over and then you have people come in and say, ‟oh that's just because they're lazy and they know they can make money off of it.” Well I mean to a point; yes, but they still have to make a whole movie that still requires a whole crew and they still have to do a bunch of work. So, that's a superficial explanation.

Underneath that however, there's the realization of a reenchantment to take place every generation at a certain period they reinjected at programming into the mass consciousness.

That's why we've got over a dozen shows that are seemingly all different but the plot is the same with the idea that we're living in the matrix or that we're living in a simulation. In fact, they're about to put out a new Matrix movie right now. I think that's just couldn't be more perfectly timed really.

On the flip side of that that we live in an age of omnipresent connection and technology but everyone's just stopped coming up with original ideas. That's not the case. It's much more likely that there's just a proscribed swimlane of ideas and agendas and those are the ones that continually get pushed and promoted and funded and injected into the mass consciousness as part of different cultures steering or cultural creation agendas.

Speaking of control, it doesn't help that the media is so utterly controlled at the top that we just keep getting the same recycled story lines and tropes presented to us on a loop generationally. It's to the point that Snopes even felt the need to ‟debunk” the idea that Walt Disney's will stipulated the company is required to remake the same Disney movies every ten years. The rumor seems like the logical conclusion of wondering why Disney just keeps churning out the same stories over and over and over. People have claimed it's just laziness and the low hanging fruit of making another buck off those recycled franchises, but movie making is still a pretty intense process that requires a lot of time, effort, and resources. Underneath that superficial explanation, however, there's a re-ritualization, a re-enchantment that needs to take place every generation at a certain period to reinject that programming into the mass consciousness. That's why we've got over a dozen shows that are all seemingly different, but the plot is essentially the same with the idea that reality isn't what you think it is and you aren't who you think you are and nothing is what it seems… In fact, after 20 years, it was just announced that Matrix 4 will be made, and it just couldn't be more perfectly timed. Once you start paying attention, the pattern isn't that hard to spot.

On the flip side, it just doesn't make sense that, in this age of omnipresent connection and technology at our fingertips, people have just stopped coming up with original ideas. It's much more likely that there is simply a prescribed swim lane of ideas, and those are the ones that continually get pushed and promoted and funded and served up to the public as part of different culture steering or culture creation agendas.

Case in point is this Tweet sent out by our friend Gonz over at Face Like the Sun: 

Interesting pick for this month's list of books to read recommended by Amazon.

I wonder if platforks like Amazon push these titles so the public has no excuse for not knowing what's happening to us today. pic.twitter.com/wY66Ajud64

— Gonz (@FaceLikeTheSun) September 2, 2019

For Amazon's Editor's picks, Best of the Month for September, they are promoting a book titled, Poisoner in Chief:  Sidney Gottlieb and the CIA Search for Mind Control by former foreign correspondent for the NYT for 20+ years Stephen Kinzer.

Let me preface this by saying I have not read this book, nor do I plan to spend money and time reading it. I feel like everything I personally need to know about this book I can get from the cover, which I know is literally judging a book by its cover, but…let me explain.

Ewen Cameron is the Canadian scapegoat, I'm sure he's in the book somewhere, I don't know but the Canadian scapegoat is Dr. Ewen Cameron. And then we have the American scapegoat, Dr. Sidney Calley.

When you encounter somebody who knows about MKULTRA at all those are the two names, if they know any names at all, that they're most likely to know. That's the purpose of a scapegoat; but we'll get back to that in a moment.

So this guy's book is getting promoted by Amazon and it's all over the mainstream media. Other times that you try to talk about this topic…when the CIA was into mind-control…you're a crazy conspiracy theorist for even bringing it up, right, but when they specifically have an angle on it that they want to promote and push which is the one narrow swim lane that's been approved here—then it's fine. So this is all over the place right now. Secrets of the CIA Sidney Gottlieb. I haven't found this article and this isn't recent, but this just shows what I'm trying to say to you…every crazy CIA plot you've ever heard of originated with one man—it was Sidney Gottlieb. Really, they had thousands of employees over there at the CIA…thousands upon thousands upon thousands…but every crazy plot you ever heard of all originated with one guy…amazing…that's silly. I don't know, whatever.

But the fact that Amazon is promoting this book on their best of the month editors picks, but they took down our film…The Minds of Men which had 76 customer reviews, 4.3 out of 5 stars; that's a pretty good rating especially considering that we talked about things that make some people very angry and so you end up getting hate reviews just based on the fact that they don't want you to talk about it because this is not ‟safe material” this is scary material about things that happened purposefully buried in the nation's history that affect us all. That's what it is and so to get four point three out of five stars I feel like it's pretty good but they took it down.
Amazon took it down claiming ‟customer feedback indicated it did not meet customer content quality expectations” Really? Which customer was that? Because I've seen a lot of movies on Amazon with crappy ratings that somehow magically get to stay on there despite their crappy ratings but that's the whole point really is an aside for just a second.

It's a scary window into society's dystopian information-controlled swimlane-enforced future. I mean there's no appeal process here. We can't write to someone and get a review.
I mean there's a lot of people who are like, ‟Well, they're a private company. They can do it." And they're championing their own demise with that attitude because they don't even realize the hoodwink that's taking place by allowing gigantic global tech corporations to control so much of what people get to see and hear. And we're not just talking about some little store on the corner…that it doesn't matter. This is global. It's the number one bookstore on the planet. So, just think about that in the future world of social credit score's, automated labor, and cashless economies. But that's… that's a whole 'nother rant for another video.

But I digress.

Once again the public is being served a tale about the Central Intelligence Agency's unethical cold war mind control experimentation project known as MK Ultra that's primarily focused on a wide array of drug experiments, complete with sordid tales of LSD, prostitute halfway houses, and the creation of Manchurian candidates, all overseen by Dr. Sidney Gottlieb. That sentence right there makes up the majority of the officially prescribed swim lane regarding this program. The other well-known name is that of Dr. Ewen Cameron, the man who oversaw Project #68 by running what has been dubbed a ‟house of horrors” at the Allen Memorial Institute up in Montreal, Canada. None of Cameron's work colleagues, several high ranking academics it was later disclosed were also involved in the project as well, are ever discussed in the media. So we have the American scapegoat Dr. Sidney Gottlieb and we have the Canadian scapegoat Dr. Ewen Cameron. When you encounter someone who knows about MK Ultra at all, those are the two names that they are the most likely to know. That's the purpose of a scapegoat. But let's get back to that in a moment.

Right after Aaron was interviewed by Dan Dicks during Bilderberg weekend, Dan got his channel demonitized completely. At the same time, Amazon suddenly took down The Minds of Men—a movie with 76 reviews and a 4.3/5 star rating on the platform (at the time), citing ‟customer feedback has indicated this title does not meet our customer content quality expectations”. Really? Which customer?

As we all know, there are a lot of movies on Amazon with crappy ratings that somehow magically get to stay on there despite having terrible ratings where more than half the reviews are one star and would be less if zero stars was an option. On an aside, using a rating system where "everyone" (or just a few someones or even just one extremely powerful CEO) decides for everyone else what will be available to see, hear, and discuss is a really scary window into society's dystopian, information controlled, swim lane enforced future. We have been informed that there's no appeal process here, so we can't write to someone and get a review or even who made this determination and specifically what it was based on or any of that because it's a private company and said private (global) company can choose to sell or not sell whatever it wants. Think about that in our quickly approaching world of automated labor, cashless economies, and social credit scores. There's a lot of people right now championing their own demise by applauding this system that's taking over. Society is going to have a real problem when just a tiny handful of gigantic global tech corporations have a monopoly on the ability to so quickly and easily control so much of what people will get to see and hear.

But I digress.

This new book (which was already listed as #1 for new releases in ‟Scientist Biographies” sitewide before it was ever officially released) is, as expected, being promoted all over the media—seemingly the one time it's okay to discuss MK Ultra without being regarded as a ‟crazy conspiracy theorist”.

2015 ish: “The CIA didn’t do experiments on mind control. That’s just in the movies and tv shows you conspiracy nut!”

2019 NPR: “... mind control, if it can be mastered, is the key to global world power.”

??https://t.co/wUyi1RwuOi

— Gonz (@FaceLikeTheSun) September 10, 2019

this documentary has won awards now so we've got all kinds of laurels on this documentary that they claim isn't good enough for their platform to have up meanwhile they will promote this guy's book though and like I said everything that I need to know about this book I can see on the cover of it I think Gottlieb himself summed it up really well and I I it took me a little bit to find this because after wading through thousands of pages of documents and books for over three years I couldn't quite remember where I heard him say it but I think Sydney got leaves scapegoat status can be summed up in this one little bit of testimony he gave in a statement to Congress in 1977 now if you haven't seen our film and don't know gottlieb chief of the technical served his staff chemical division who signed off on each MKULTRA sub project was given complete immunity in exchange for his testimony before Congress so all of his testimony and everything he did immunity he got immunity to testify about these things this is from the human drug testing by the CIA 1977 hearings before the Subcommittee on health and scientific research of the Committee on human resources of the Senate 95th Congress first session which happened in September of 1977 and Gottlieb is back he gets done reading this whole big long statement about what his role is in this whole project and everything else and blah blah blah blah blah and he gets down to the end of his statement and says in conclusion I would like to comment on three things which trouble me very much about the situation I find myself in the first thing he says is that he's being smeared in the press because they're saying he tried to avoid testifying which he says is untrue and again why wouldn't he testify he had immunity so whatever right and the second thing that he mentions is that he feels victimized I know it's like Oh boohoo poor guy who was running MKULTRA that's really sad for you you're such a victim but he feels victimized and he's appalled at the CIA's policy wherein someone or some group selectively pinpoints his name by failing to delete it from documents released under Freedom of Information Act without any permission for me that is my name is selectively left on release documents where all or most others are deleted and that is really all you need to know I mean I'm not saying there's probably not some important information diving into the hole Gottlieb as a person we actually dispensed with his scapegoat but in 20 minutes in a film that's 3 hours and 42 minutes long so so there's two things about this first of all the CIA is not gonna hire people whose job it is is to redact documents and don't know how to use a sharpie marker that's not going to happen okay that's pretty basic hey Shirley your job is to react to these documents hope you know how to use a sharpie right only when I don't see sidney gottlieb Smee everyone else's name I know how to mark through but when I see his name for some reason I forget how to put a marker on a piece of paper and make a line it's ridiculous it's it's ridiculous okay and back in 1953 right before Allen Dulles signed off on MKULTRA Richard Helms who was then acting deputy director of plans wrote a memo about it where he talks about how MKULTRA is gonna have to sensitive research fields a is covert studies of biological and chemical warfare so that would be your drug research goes under chemical and biological warfare be is redacted so there were two fields here not just one it wasn't just drugs that's what they always tell everyone that's not what it was here's the memo that's what it says in fact later in this memo there's a whole section where it says for example we intend to investigate the development of a chemical material which causes a reversible non-toxic aberrant mental state the specific nature of which can be reasonably well predicted for each individual this material could potentially aid in discrediting individuals eliciting information implanting suggestions and other forms of mental control so there's your drug induced mind-control and then there's be a whole section that's still redacted to this day as if a wasn't horrible enough it's horrible enough to full-on admit they want chemical mind-control but then there's a whole nother paragraph it's totally redacted never focused on secondly there was a progress report released on MKULTRA in 1963 and one of the things that stuck out to me in this progress report as extremely interesting is the fact that it's admitted in here that there are just two individuals in the Technical Services Division who had quote full substantive knowledge of the program and most of that knowledge is unrecorded that means that it doesn't even matter if the records were destroyed all the records at Helm's supposedly ordered to be destroyed and Gottlieb admits and testimony was destroyed because there's only two people in that entire division who have full substantive knowledge of what this program is really getting at anyways and their knowledge is not written down anywhere and it goes on to say that everyone else from clerical assistants to professional associates are under a need-to-know doctrine to a maximum degree which means everyone else who is involved besides those two individuals they don't know they're on a need-to-know so they only know what they need to which isn't everything they don't have a full substantive knowledge so do you really think does anybody really believe immunity or not that the CIA is gonna accidentally forget to redact the name of one of those two people and then put him in a position where he has to repeal he testify before Congress about it because the short answer is no oh come on okay I'm not saying sidney gottlieb is a victim he's a scapegoat there's actually a difference how much of that he was in complicit in we won't ever know so but he was and when you read it if you ever decided to which I don't know why any of you really would but if you ever take the time to read through the complete and utter joke that was Senator Kennedy you're running these hearings obviously without a view to really figuring out what was going on at all but just to have like a public dog and pony show for to appease the public because it came out they were doing this and they had to have something to show for that my contemplation of activity CIA or any other of our intelligence agency should undertake if you read through and it's interesting how many times these guys don't have a good memory but they were all very compartmentalized and it was admitted that all the documents are boiler plates anyways but the point is in these boiler plate documents meaning they're not the real documents in fact it's been said the real documents were all destroyed but more likely they're just in some you know Indiana Jones vault somewhere like the Ark of the Covenant but in those documents guy leaves name just magically doesn't get redacted all the time everyone else's name does he's got a point he's not out there screaming I'm a patsy but he might as well be because that's what that is he was the designated guy just like you and Cameron was the designated guy in Canada that's why every time you hear about anything having to do with Canada it's only his name even though there's a whole host of other characters which we get into in our film we were all also doing things and some of them were doing much more horrible things actually and they never talked about those people they just always mentioned you and Cameron who just died in a mysterious death right before all this stuff came out so he's not there to correct the record or say anything at all cuz he's dead makes a really great scapegoat just like this guy's a scapegoat society is so disconnected from its ancestral past that people cannot recognize a scapegoat when they see one our film the minds of men dispensed with Gottlieb in the drug angle that they've been pushing on the public for nearly half a century now within the first 20 minutes of a movie that's almost four hours long does that tell you anything about how important and central Gottlieb is to focus on our film painstakingly documented we even won Best Documentary at the innuendo festival in Italy they screened the entire film we couldn't afford to go but we won Best Documentary but we can't appeal to Amazon they even ask why they took our movie down but they just keep delivering this same story again and again look it's the poisoner in chief every crazy CIA plot you've heard of originated with one man Sidney Gottlieb [Music] like he's just this crazy dr. Frankenstein he didn't have any higher-ups or bosses or anybody he was just running a whole tire show is just only him he was coming up with everything no one else had any ideas or anything everyone else was just like oh we can't stop him I think it's just every crazy idea ever only originated with this one scapegoat you don't say how much more can everyone's intelligence be insulted by this fairy tale where science and secrecy merge the aim is controlling an individual to the point where he will do our bidding against his will in the minds of men one thing to realize about systems is how they are controlled and we must get rid of any notions straight away that control is something imposed on the system from outside it has to be built into it

Are you seeking peace? Do you want to help us spread the message of peace? You have come to the right place.

A Broken planet...

Broken people...

A broken relationship with the Creator...

Healing starts today.

You can start collecting peace coins today. Join the site and establish an account today.